Pages

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Comprehension test (a challenge if ever there was one)



Explain what these sentences mean… Please.
“The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relationships in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.”
- Written by Judith Butler, professor of rhetoric and comparative literature at the University of California at Berkeley.

"If, for a while, the ruse of desire is calculable for the uses of discipline soon the repetition of guilt, justification, pseudo -scientific theories, superstition, spurious authorities, and classification can be seen as the desperate effort to 'normalize' formally the disturbance of a discourse of splitting that violates the rational, enlightened claims of its enunciatory modality."
- Written by Homi K. Bhabha, professor of English at the University of Chicago in his book The Location of Culture.


Note: I usually score very high on comprehension test but both these pieces caused me immense confusion before I could even finish reading them. I just can't read it because my mind starts tying itself in knots just trying to figure out what any given sequence of ten words means, let alone an entire phrase.

4 comments:

  1. Excuse me but my brain has just melted.

    ReplyDelete
  2. (The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relationships in relatively homologous ways)


    (to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation)



    (brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects)

    (to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.”)

    Breaking it up helps.
    However, the self-absorbed verbosity is just ridiculous. :P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Previous conversation:

    • Simon Miller Total jargon. Remind me of the classic reviews over at anus.com...

    http://www.anus.com/metal/asphyx/

    Asphyx - Death Metal
    www.anus.com
    death metal band Asphyx
    50 minutes ago · Like ·
    Michael Van Ryan Is it bad that I can make sense of those? I'm struggling to re-write the first one in less than twice the words, though.
    49 minutes ago · Like
    Michael Van Ryan When I say make sense, I mean extract some degree of meaning. Isolating particular segments is.. difficult.
    45 minutes ago · Unlike · 1
    Michael Van Ryan Part of the problem with the first one is the pre-contextual understanding of structuralism and Louis Altherusser's ideas.
    43 minutes ago · Like
    Simon Miller My cat's breath smells like cats food.
    43 minutes ago · Unlike · 2
    Rosalie Fitzpatrick That's what I can do. If I read a section under ten words I can, on average, understand where it is leading. Then the words pile up, the clauses shift the understood meaning and the phrases that are added in make it a jumbled mess. Top it off with not feeling too healthy right now and you get "aarrgh!" from me. :)
    35 minutes ago · Like
    Rosalie Fitzpatrick And those reviews Simon, I can read them. A little garbled and wannabe highbrow but understandable.
    33 minutes ago · Like
    Simon Miller My cat's name is mittens.
    32 minutes ago · Like · 1

    ReplyDelete
  4. Self absorbed verbosity is it. Too caught up in being smart to actually be smart is how I see it.

    ReplyDelete